How about hiring two superintendents for DISD next time?

One solution to DISD’s ongoing troubles is to split the district into three or four smaller districts, each run by a separate superintendent and funded independently — the smaller units should make for more homegrown and attentive governance.

As long as each smaller unit receives the same amount of funding for student education, it shouldn’t be a problem, right? And maybe the Texas Rangers will win the World Series next year, too.

Well, how about this idea: Where is it written that an urban school district has to have a superintendent who runs the whole show? Why can’t the DISD board hire a superintendent for academics (a job current Supt. Michael Hinojosa seems to have done well) and a separate superintendent for finance (obviously, this hasn’t been Hinojosa’s strong suit)?

Written By
More from Rick Wamre

Will this year mark the end of DISD’s learning centers?

This issue has reared its head from time to time since I’ve...
Read More