How about hiring two superintendents for DISD next time?

One solution to DISD’s ongoing troubles is to split the district into three or four smaller districts, each run by a separate superintendent and funded independently — the smaller units should make for more homegrown and attentive governance.

As long as each smaller unit receives the same amount of funding for student education, it shouldn’t be a problem, right? And maybe the Texas Rangers will win the World Series next year, too.

Well, how about this idea: Where is it written that an urban school district has to have a superintendent who runs the whole show? Why can’t the DISD board hire a superintendent for academics (a job current Supt. Michael Hinojosa seems to have done well) and a separate superintendent for finance (obviously, this hasn’t been Hinojosa’s strong suit)?


WANT MORE?
Click to sign up for the Advocate's weekly news digest and be the first to know what’s happening in Oak Cliff.
Written By
More from Rick Wamre

DISD update: Are things as bad as they seem?

I spent my Friday afternoon at DISD’s special board meeting to discuss...
Read More