This is a column about shopping ethics, if there is such a thing: When is it appropriate to buy a product online that you’ve talked about extensively with an in-store sales rep?
A few of us were sitting around the other day talking about this very issue. The specific instance: I needed a digital camera, and my choice was shopping at a local camera store, where the employees are knowledgeable but that expertise typically results in a more expensive product; or shopping online, where prices are lower but employees to answer questions are nonexistent.
I argued that if I go into the local camera store and spend a bunch of time asking a helpful and knowledgeable employee questions — all the while planning to purchase the camera online or at Best Buy — I’m cheating the local store by intentionally wasting the company’s resources.
Another person in the group disagreed: She saw no problem soliciting the local guy’s knowledge and then leaving the store, ostensibly needing to “think it over”, while immediately heading to Best Buy or the internet — that was her plan all along.
I said her plan seemed dishonest. She said my plan was a waste of money.
Then a third person jumped into the conversation (actually, we forced her to choose a side), and she offered a third option: Since she already buys photos at the local store (“better quality,” she says), she had no problem asking the employee all about a camera even if she had no intention of buying it there. After all, she says, she’s already a customer, and they’re already making money from her purchases.
So from an ethical standpoint, what’s the right thing to do? Buy from the merchant that shows you the product — even if it costs a bit more — justifying the higher price because of the merchant’s expertise and personal service? Or solicit the product information from a local merchant, then turn around and demand the same price being offered by a national retailer or website or threaten to take the business elsewhere?
The foundation of any business is providing service to customers; local businesses tend to do that best because they hope the customer is a neighbor who will come back again. The internet, on the other hand, shows no favorites, nor do those who use it extensively for shopping: It’s a free-for-all daily, with the best price changing by the minute.
But if the lowest price is our only purchasing criteria, what kind of economy — what kind of country — will we have in a few years? Will we kill off local businesses in favor of buying everything online, and is that really a good idea?
Like I said, it’s hard to imagine a topic we all know more about than shopping.
What’s less obvious is how much we know about shopping ethics and how those ethics will impact our future.
Click to sign up for the Advocate's weekly news digest and be the first to know what’s happening in Oak Cliff.